18,245 notes
Jessica Simpson named her newborn daughter Max?
What in the fuck is wrong with people? Is she retarded? Did no one tell her it’s a fuckin’ girl?
7 notes
Really?… Seriously guys?… So not everyone who smokes weed is a bum, but that doesn’t negate the fact that everyone who smokes it could be better if they didn’t.
This is totally just my personal opinion and I can understand and respect why your perspective is different, and that’s cool, but I don’t see why anyone who smokes would be better off if they didn’t. Cannabis makes a difference in the lives of patients who need an alternative to addicting pain pills. According to the OMCA, “Today, new studies are being published in peer-reviewed journals that demonstrate cannabis has medical value in treating patients with seri- ous illnesses such as AIDS, glaucoma, cancer, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and chronic pain.” ”Current research clearly indicates that cannabinoids can have tumor-reducing and anti-cancer properties.” ”Cannabis has been found to help cancer patients with the symptoms that usually accompany cancer such as pain, nausea, wasting, and loss of appetite.”
“Recent scientific advances in the study of cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids have produced exciting new leads in the search for anti-cancer treatments. Several-hundred research articles have been published on the effects of cannabinoids on cancer cells. We now know cannabinoids stop many kinds of cancers from gowing and spreading, including brain, breast, leukemic, melanoma, phaeochromocytoma, liver and other kinds of cancer.23-40 Cannabinoids have been repeatedly shown to promote apoptosis (programmed cell death of the tumor cells) and halt angiogenesis (blood vessel production to the tumor).”
“INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
“Nausea, appetite loss, pain and anxiety . . all can be mitigated by marijuana…. For patients, such as those with AIDS or undergoing chemotherapy, who suffer simultaneously from severe pain, nau- sea, and appetite loss, cannabinoid drugs might offer broad spectrum relief not found in any other single medication.”
Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base, 1999”
This is just a very very small amount ofquotes from research I have done. To see more, check this out: http://www.omca2012.org/contactus/printresources
I think it’s worth everyone’s while to realize that cannabis is not only a legitimate medication for patient’s in need, but also a legitimate thing for everyone to use in general. Cannabis does not deplete the lung’s abilities at all. Cannabis does not encourage lethargic habits - unless you are smoking an Indica. Sativa strains do not encourage any sort of laziness or non-motivation. That is all in the user’s head - they can blame it on cannabis, yes, but it is not a a side effect of using cannabis.
I honesty do not see how a habitual and/or non habitual cannabis smoker could better from NOT smoking weed.
Cannabis gives us an alternative to dangerous and harmful and very very addicting pain medications. Many medications have nasty side effects that cannabis does not.
Okay, I wasn’t referring to people who use it strictly as a pain reliever.
Let’s use Phelps here as an example.
If he were to never smoke weed, he might have spent that time practicing something that would improve his record breaking times in the Olympics. I am saying that people who use it for recreational purposes are wasting their time. They could be putting themselves to far better use.
I don’t exactly appreciate people using the “marijuana is medicinal” argument to justify smoking for fun.
(Source: gneap)
2,911 notes
Really?… Seriously guys?… So not everyone who smokes weed is a bum, but that doesn’t negate the fact that everyone who smokes it could be better if they didn’t.
(Source: gneap, via cannabislifestyle)
2,911 notes
WORD!
Oh bullshit. That makes no sense. If you dress in the same attire as a prostitute, then how can you seriously expect to be treated better than one? That’s absurd. You don’t show skin when you want someone to listen to your business proposal. Get fuckin’ real.
(Source: adventuresofcomicbookgirl, via cultviolet)
6,349 notes
THIS IS PERFECT.Hi, there.
I’m wearing a shirt that reads “Kill Me”.
If you saw me at a party or on the street would you promptly murder me?
What about if I had a few drinks? What if I was walking alone at night?
I’m guessing that you wouldn’t if you’re a sane individual.
The cops wouldn’t overlook your crime because of what I’m wearing because that’s silly. I wasn’t literally asking for you to kill me based on my choice of clothing.Who would take that defense seriously?My friends wouldn’t blame me for being murdered and my killer would be behind bars almost instantly.
So, why is it okay to rape someone because they’re wearing promiscuous clothes? Why does THEIR choice of clothing excuse THEIR attacker?
It doesn’t. You’re silly if you think otherwise.
The less guilt on the attacker. The more guilt on victim.
Stop. Victim. Blaming.Not quite. This is a poor comparison. Having the words “kill me!” on a shirt is in no way the same thing as skimpy clothing. A woman wearing revealing clothes raises sexual arousal. I think that’s safe to say. Where as the words “kill me” don’t exactly make murderers get a hard on. I am in no way saying rape is okay. I am just saying that this guys argument is absolutely terrible.
Oh, I see.
You’re not saying rape is okay, but you are saying it’s the girl’s fault if the guy can’t control himself after he gets a raging hard-on (a hard-on the girl may or may not have intended to cause but even if she intended to turn people on that in no way means she was expecting to be raped because of it)?
That’s victim-blaming, you piece of shit.
I would also venture to say that a good majority of people who have been raped neither dressed nor acted in sexually provocative ways, so this whole outfit-shaming of female-identified people is a complete and utter bullshit moot argument, fuckface.
Listen, calling names just makes your argument look less credible. How about we stop the name calling and actually discuss what’s at hand.
I am not saying the man isn’t guilty, I’m not saying the women were asking for it either, I AM saying that this original post is a bullshit comparison. I am simply saying that his shirt is not the same thing as provocative clothing. There are however situations that I think it is partially the woman’s fault. Don’t take that the wrong way, because I think that the person doing the act of rape is always more so in the wrong. Unless of course, we are talking about statutory rape claims. Sometimes those are younger girls seducing and then lying. I have been called to come take a 14 year old girl to the hospital because she got raped at a party. She was very much underage and dressed very provocatively. I’m sure her clothes and choice of company is a huge part of how the situation happened. I do think whoever did rape her is in the wrong, more so than her. That doesn’t mean she didn’t set herself up for it. Got it “fuckface”?
37,464 notes
1 note
55,701 notes
THIS IS PERFECT.Hi, there.
I’m wearing a shirt that reads “Kill Me”.
If you saw me at a party or on the street would you promptly murder me?
What about if I had a few drinks? What if I was walking alone at night?
I’m guessing that you wouldn’t if you’re a sane individual.
The cops wouldn’t overlook your crime because of what I’m wearing because that’s silly. I wasn’t literally asking for you to kill me based on my choice of clothing.Who would take that defense seriously?My friends wouldn’t blame me for being murdered and my killer would be behind bars almost instantly.
So, why is it okay to rape someone because they’re wearing promiscuous clothes? Why does THEIR choice of clothing excuse THEIR attacker?
It doesn’t. You’re silly if you think otherwise.
The less guilt on the attacker. The more guilt on victim.
Stop. Victim. Blaming.
Not quite. This is a poor comparison. Having the words “kill me!” on a shirt is in no way the same thing as skimpy clothing. A woman wearing revealing clothes raises sexual arousal. I think that’s safe to say. Where as the words “kill me” don’t exactly make murderers get a hard on. I am in no way saying rape is okay. I am just saying that this guys argument is absolutely terrible.
(Source: , via antisocial-butterfly)
37,464 notes
6 notes
Why do people like this? Her hair looks like when my dog has diarrhea and it gets on his tail. This is disgusting. You look homeless.
(Source: thoushaltknot, via cannabislifestyle)
657 notes
What they did not want you to ever find out is that your generation, the generation born between 1980-1995, actually outnumbers the Baby Boomers. They knew that if you ever turned your eye towards political reform, you could change the world. They tried to keep you sated on vapid television shows and vapid music. They cut off your education and fed you brain candy. They took away your music and gave you Top Ten pop stations. They cut off your art and replaced it with endless reality shows for you to plug into, hoping you would sit quietly by as they ran the world. We as a society are only as strong as our weakest link. Give ‘em hell, kids.
yes yes yes yes YES!
(Source: katedanley, via cannabislifestyle)
63,993 notes
hitlers speeches were so much cooler than dr martin luther king jrs.
Even if you don’t know German, you can watch his speeches and still get fired up. Afterwards you will probably have the desire to kill a jew and you won’t know why.
29 notes
GPOY
(Source: old-trenchy, via lauralive)
48,525 notes
(Source: onkelspeer, via rastlos-vandraren)
200 notes
